Yesterday we discussed the importance of placing scientific research in advance of political scaremongering when dealing with a topic as important as the current coronavirus controversy. And so we continue.
Below are the words of a research scientist who informs us that the virus kits being sent to hospitals all over America are not even capable of detecting whether a patient has specifically contracted COVID-19. We would expect this bombshell to have been reported by the corporate media by now, but the gatekeepers of information remain silent.
If there is anything we want to know regarding COVID-19, it's this: how many people are testing positive for that illness, and how many are dying each day as a result of having contracted that virus?
The statistics keep piling up every day, ostensibly the result of people arriving at the hospital and testing positive for COVID-19, with an increasing number of people said to have remained at the facility where they ultimately died. But if the tests are not accurate, we can't count on death statistics to be accurate either, can we? Those compiling the statistics are really just crossing their fingers and hoping you'll buy what they're selling.
But crossing our fingers and hoping the stats we've compiled are "close enough" is not how we arrive at scientific accuracy, and if there is anything we want to be accurate about right now it is the actual, verifiable body count from COVID-19. If this research scientist is to be believed, the tests currently being administered in our hospitals were simply not designed to make that important determination.
What we know of the coronavirus is that there are are numerous varieties. But the only strain any of us is rightly concerned about right now -the one that is forcing a shutdown of the entire country- is the strain known as COVID-19. None of the other strains matter. If we have no way of scientifically measuring who has COVID-19 in their bodies and who does not, then we are being lied to about the number of people said to have died from it.
Here is that report, courtesy of GlobalResearch.ca:
I work in the healthcare field. Here’s the problem: we are testing people for any strain of a Coronavirus. Not specifically for COVID-19. There are no reliable tests for a specific COVID-19 virus. There are no reliable agencies or media outlets for reporting numbers of actual COVID-19 virus cases. This needs to be addressed first and foremost. Every action and reaction to COVID-19 is based on totally flawed data and we simply can not make accurate assessments.
This is why you’re hearing that most people with COVID-19 are showing nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. That’s because most Coronavirus strains are nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. The few actual novel Coronavirus cases do have some worse respiratory responses, but still have a very promising recovery rate, especially for those without prior issues.
The ‘gold standard’ in testing for COVID-19 is laboratory isolated/purified coronavirus particles free from any contaminants and particles that look like viruses but are not, that have been proven to be the cause of the syndrome known as COVID-19 and obtained by using proper viral isolation methods and controls (not the PCR that is currently being used or Serology /antibody tests which do not detect virus as such). PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome.
The problem is the test is known not to work.
It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analyzed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery.
Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.
The Mickey Mouse test kits being sent out to hospitals, at best, tell analysts you have some viral DNA in your cells. Which most of us do, most of the time. It may tell you the viral sequence is related to a specific type of virus – say the huge family of coronavirus. But that’s all. The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense.
And that’s not even getting into the other issue – viral load.
If you remember the PCR works by amplifying minute amounts of DNA. It therefore is useless at telling you how much virus you may have. And that’s the only question that really matters when it comes to diagnosing illness. Everyone will have a few virus kicking round in their system at any time, and most will not cause illness because their quantities are too small. For a virus to sicken you you need a lot of it, a massive amount of it. But PCR does not test viral load and therefore can’t determine if it is present in sufficient quantities to sicken you.
If you feel sick and get a PCR test any random virus DNA might be identified even if they aren’t at all involved in your sickness which leads to false diagnosis.
And coronavirus are incredibly common. A large percentage of the world human population will have covi DNA in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with some other pathogen.
Do you see where this is going yet? If you want to create a totally false panic about a totally false pandemic – pick a coronavirus.
They are incredibly common and there’s tons of them. A very high percentage of people who have become sick by other means (flu, bacterial pneumonia, anything) will have a positive PCR test for covi even if you’re doing them properly and ruling out contamination, simply because covis are so common.
There are hundreds of thousands of flu and pneumonia victims in hospitals throughout the world at any one time.
All you need to do is select the sickest of these in a single location – say Wuhan – administer PCR tests to them and claim anyone showing viral sequences similar to a coronavirus (which will inevitably be quite a few) is suffering from a ‘new’ disease.
Since you already selected the sickest flu cases, a fairly high proportion of your sample will go on to die.
You can then say this ‘new’ virus has a CFR higher than the flu and use this to infuse more concern and do more tests which will of course produce more ‘cases’, which expands the testing, which produces yet more ‘cases’ and so on and so on.
Before long you have your ‘pandemic’, and all you have done is use a simple test kit trick to convert the worst flu and pneumonia cases into something new that doesn’t actually exist.
Now just run the same scam in other countries. Making sure to keep the fear message running high so that people will feel panicky and less able to think critically.
Your only problem is going to be that – due to the fact there is no actual new deadly pathogen but just regular sick people, you are mislabeling your case numbers, and especially your deaths, are going to be way too low for a real new deadly virus pandemic.
But you can stop people pointing this out in several ways.
1. You can claim this is just the beginning and more deaths are imminent. Use this as an excuse to quarantine everyone and then claim the quarantine prevented the expected millions of dead.
2. You can tell people that ‘minimizing’ the dangers is irresponsible and bully them into not talking about numbers.
3. You can talk crap about made up numbers hoping to blind people with pseudoscience.
4. You can start testing well people (who, of course, will also likely have shreds of coronavirus DNA in them) and thus inflate your ‘case figures’ with ‘asymptomatic carriers’ (you will of course have to spin that to sound deadly even though any virologist knows the more symptom-less cases you have the less deadly is your pathogen.
Take these 4 simple steps and you can have your own entirely manufactured pandemic up and running in weeks.
They can not “confirm” something for which there is no accurate test.[END]
UPDATE: This ought to shock you. Still believe science matters to those who are pushing this narrative? Click the link:
CDC Tells Hospitals To List COVID as Cause of Death Even if You're Just Assuming or It Only Contributed
More To Come
I will be posting shorter-than-usual content here every day or two for the next little while so they are easier to read and view. Coming up we'll hear from dozens of medical professionals who tell us things are very different from the reports coming in from the corporate media regarding COVID-19.
Also to come: we may have cracked that mystery of the quiet hospitals in New York City, plus a growing number of people are objecting when their loved ones are reported as having died from COVID-19 when it was known those victims actually expired from common illnesses like heart disease, cancer, and even Alzheimer's. Also, the rise of citizen journalists and how they are scooping the pros, and we'll look at the names and faces of individuals who expect to make a lot of money by keeping you afraid.
Lots more to come. Check back here regularly, and scroll through my Facebook page because I toss new and interesting stuff up there every day.
Read yesterday's blog post if you haven't already, and remember:
Follow the Science, Not the Sensationalism.