Sunday, June 3, 2018

The Church Ain't The Kingdom, Part Two

 Previously: The Church Ain't The Kingdom, Part One

By March of 1844, Joseph Smith had only three months to live. He left no record indicating he knew he was about to depart this world, but that didn't keep others from making up stories years later that he had been dropping hints.

What we do know about Joseph Smith in those final three months of his life is that he had been laboring mightily to lay the foundation for a socio-political system that would, in his words, "revolutionize the whole world." It turned out that the church he had founded fourteen years earlier had been merely a first step toward something much bigger. The result of his labors was to be neither part of the church, nor controlled by the church.

By this time, Joseph had very little interest in governing the church. He had turned over administrative duties to his brother Hyrum, who not only had all the gifts of a prophet, seer, and revelator, but was also the Patriarch. That office, Joseph said, was the highest office in the church, giving Hyrum Smith more authority than was held by even Joseph Smith himself. One of the things that annoyed Joseph Smith no end was that the members still kept looking to him for answers when they should have been looking to Hyrum. But no one seemed to listen. Church members kept running to Joseph with every little question or problem. Joseph Smith had bigger things on his mind.

By March of 1844, the growth of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was exploding like never before. New members were converging daily on the city of Nauvoo and surrounding areas. Converts from the British Isles were arriving literally by the boatload, and in the midst of all this, the church continued to face the same persecutions it had been facing from the start. No matter where the Saints wound up settling, it wasn't long before their neighbors wanted them gone.

The fledgling U.S. constitution guaranteed the Saints freedom to worship, but it lacked the enforcement authority to make certain they were permitted to live in peace. The constitution only guaranteed people that the federal government would not interfere with their rights; it had no authority to prevent state governments from persecuting them. Far from offering the Mormons sanctuary and protection, the governors of the states of Missouri and Illinois had personally set their hands against the Mormons. So Joseph Smith eventually concluded the saints would have to move once more, this time to someplace outside the borders of the United States; some yet-undecided, sparsely populated area where they could create a commonwealth of their own.

A commonwealth is nothing more nor less than a political community founded for the common good of the people living under it, and the the key component of the commonwealth Joseph Smith was proposing was that it would not be a Mormon community. This commonwealth would be open to all people of good will. Whatever religion you adhered to -or even if you adhered to no religion at all- you would be welcome in this new community so long as you respected the rights of others to be left alone in theirs.

Joseph selected a council made up of fifty men which came to be known as the Council of Fifty, the purpose of which would be to protect the people in their rights and one day serve as the government for the kingdom of God on the earth. It was formed, in Joseph's words, for "the purpose of laying the foundation for a theocracy in preparation for the millennial reign of Jesus Christ." In short, it was intended to lay a foundation of freedom that would eventually fulfill the prophecy of Daniel, who foresaw in the last days the establishment of a kingdom ruled by God that would eventually supplant all other kingdoms on the earth.

It should be noted that this was not an attempt to institute Zion. The Lord has declared that only He can accomplish that purpose, and in His own good time He will. Still, a noble attempt by any people to live together in peace in spite of their differences would have demonstrated to the Lord that at least some of His followers were preparing themselves for that eventuality.

This council was made up of both Mormons and non-Mormons, indicative of Joseph's insistence that the kingdom of God was not to be an auxiliary of the Church. Membership in this governing body would fluctuate over time, the hope being that eventually more non-Mormons would be elected to serve, keeping it from remaining top-heavy with latter-day saints. This proposed commonwealth of equals may have been initiated with the help of Mormons at the beginning, but it was to be a completely non-denominational and non-partisan community. Said the prophet,
"There are men admitted members of this honorable council who are not members of the church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, neither profess any creed or religious sentiment whatever, to show that in the organization of this kingdom men are not consulted as to their religious opinions or notions in any shape or form whatever and that we act upon the broad and liberal principle that all men have equal rights, and ought to be respected...Hence the importance of thrusting from us every spirit of bigotry and intolerance towards a man's religious sentiments, that spirit which has drenched the world in blood -when a man feels the least temptation to such intolerance he ought to spurn it from him." (The Joseph Smith Papers: Administrative Records, Council of Fifty Minutes pg 97-100)
The prophet continued,
"I will appeal to every man in this council beginning at the youngest that when he arrives at the hoary age he will have to say that the principles of intolerance and bigotry never had a place in this kingdom." 
A Society Patterned After That Of Heaven
Joseph Smith and the members of the council of fifty were strongly convinced they were on the verge of something very big. The spirit of God was palpable in the meetings of the council. "It seemed like heaven had begun on earth," said one member of the council describing the experience years later. And indeed, that was the idea. The kingdom of God on earth was intended to mirror the kingdom of God as it functioned in heaven, as near as it was possible for any group of people to institute such a society. It would be done by basing the society on principles of non-coercion.
"So will it be when the purposes of God shall be accomplished: when the Lord shall be King over the whole earth and Jerusalem His throne." (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, pg 252)
Man's law had proven insufficient to protect the rights of all people at all times and in all places, so this proposed new kingdom would be based on God's law, not man's. That meant the guiding principle would require little more than what we know today as the moral primacy of basic respect: do unto others as you would have others do unto you.

The full name of the kingdom, as given through revelation, was to be "The Kingdom of God and His Laws, With the Keys and Power Thereof, and Judgement in the Hands of his Servants."  That was a mouthful, so in the interim those tasked with getting the kingdom underway referred to their committee interchangeably as the Council of Fifty or as the Kingdom. In their minds, the kingdom of God was not something they were hoping to find in the next life; it was already present in the here and now.

We are only just now coming to understand the workings of the Council of Fifty and precisely how the kingdom of God would operate, because Joseph and the council decided from the beginning to keep it's deliberations secret until the project was fully underway. Outside of the Council itself, none of the other members of the church had the slightest clue as to the council's existence, or of the plans being formulated to find a safe place for the saints to remove to. They certainly hadn't contemplated the possibility that the vision of Daniel was about to be fulfilled right under their noses.

Secrecy was decided on because it was feared that enemies of the church might misinterpret the intent of the council as an insurrection against the government of the United States; but insurrection was the furthest thing from these men's minds. Sidney Rigdon explained the nature and object of the council:
"The design was to form a Theocracy according to the will of heaven, planted without any intention to interfere with any government of the world. We wish to have nothing to do with them. We have no violence to offer to governments, no rights to infringe. The object is to live so far above their laws that they cannot interfere with us, unless by violence."
"We will hunt a spot somewhere on the earth where no other government has jurisdiction and cannot interfere with us and there plant our standard. You need not fear that we desire to trample on the rights of any man or set of men, only to seek the enjoyment of our own rights."
So, why the secrecy, if the council's purpose was so innocuous? Rigdon explains,
"It is nevertheless necessary to be careful and prudent inasmuch as there is much disposition in the minds of men to cry treason at every thing we do. We may expect to have every specie of iniquity and mobocracy practiced upon us that can be; hence the necessity of utmost confidence and integrity amongst ourselves...We have been betrayed in times past, and we consider it wisdom to be careful, lest some pervert the truth and make trouble." (Council of Fifty Minutes, Supra pg 88-89.) 
The possibility that any Americans would actually quit the homeland and set up shop just outside its borders was not that far-fetched an idea at the time. As Nathan B. Oman writes,
"North America was littered with abortive republics seeking varying levels of independence from the federal government and from other competing powers on the continent." (The Council of Fifty: What the Records Reveal about Mormon History, Matthew J. Grow and R. Eric Smith, eds, pg 57.)
Quite a few groups had done just that. In the early part of the 19th century there were autonomous collectives declaring their independence all over the continent: West Florida, for example, or outside Vermont, or the (almost) State of Franklin near the Appalachian and Blue Ridge mountains. And then there was that newly formed Republic of Texas down near the border of Mexico.

Deep In The Heart Of Texas
Among the possible locations for the founding of their commonwealth, the council had been considering three locations in particular: Texas, the Rockies, and Wisconsin. (At that time, Wisconsin was still a territory, not a state.) Exploratory committees were being assigned to go and scope out these territories and determine their suitability, when out of the blue Joseph and Hyrum were assassinated and everything got put on hold.

Texas had been considered by some to be the most viable of the three possible locations. Many Americans yearning for more freedom and opportunity had been leaving the states and pouring into that area for the past ten years, among them Davy Crockett, the former congressman from Tennessee who turned his back on his former constituents saying, "Y'all can go to hell. I'm goin' to Texas."

Wisconsin territory was only a hundred miles from Jackson County, where the saints ultimately expected to return to, so you would think Wisconsin would have been the logical choice for the Mormons to sit things out until the millennium. Texas, however, had a special appeal to many on the council. The Americans currently moving to those wide open spaces were known for their independent live-and-let live attitude. And those expatriates had already formed Texas into an independent republic of their own, so that was another plus right there. A republic is the equivalent of a commonwealth, and there was plenty of room to spread out in that republic, so the area seemed ready-made for a people seeking a place where they could make their home and not be bothered.

Some on the council even believed those Texans would make mighty fine Mormons and be a cinch to convert. To the extent that many of them were Christians, I'd say that might have been a distinct possibility. Mormonism under Joseph Smith was a very different religion than it later became under the autocratic Brigham Young. We might scoff at the idea of Texans joining the LDS Church en masse today, but it should be remembered that early Mormonism was much more accommodating to a wide spectrum of beliefs and attitudes than it has become in our day. As a final selling point in Texas' favor, both the white immigrants coming into Texas and the Mexican natives were known to be getting along swimmingly with each other, socializing together and often intermarrying. That was evidence that bigotry and intolerance might already be diminishing in that corner of the continent.

For reasons of his own, Brigham Young favored taking the saints to the Rocky Mountains, but he couldn't do anything to prevent Lyman Wight from heading down to Texas to check out that area as a possible landing site. Before Joseph Smith was killed, Wight had been assigned to go down south and scope out Texas, so Brigham knew he couldn't countermand that order. Still, Brigham let Lyman know he wasn't keen on Lyman making the trip, and admitted to Wight his fear that if it was widely known Wight was leaving for Texas, virtually everyone in the city would want to leave with him. So publicly Brigham Young attempted to undermine Wight's authority. Wight would have none of that, and effectively told Brigham Young to go to hell, because he was going to Texas.

To Brigham's chagrin, a sizable number of Mormons did go with Wight to Texas, and once they got there they all decided to stay. True to character, Brigham Young excommunicated his fellow apostle, but Wight didn't care. He hadn't recognized Brigham Young's authority anyway.

Still Secret After All These Years
Until quite recently, the minutes of the Council of Fifty meetings have remained locked deep in the Church archives, inaccessible to the membership of the Church. For reasons I can only surmise, LDS Church officials did not want the members to know what was in those minutes, so until now we have had no real knowledge of how the council operated. Modern historians came to know of its existence through mentions in journals, letters, private histories, and other documents, but they could only speculate about what the council might have been up to, and for what actual purpose it had been formed.

In 2014, Signature Books published The Council of Fifty: A Documentary History. This fascinating volume is a record of everything written by the contemporary participants in that council that hadn't been locked away in the vault, and it is a treasure trove of insight and information. We not only get first-person accounts regarding the council's activities, but in the penumbra of their writings we can detect some reasons why this ambitious project died before ever having the chance to draw breath.

In 2016 the Church finally released the actual minutes of the council meetings that had been hidden away in the vault, and now this volume of minutes, combined with the documentary history published by Signature Books, provides us with the background on what may be the most spectacular failure in the entire history of the Church. It was a failure that could have been avoided had Church leadership at the time fulfilled the charge given to them by the prophet. They let the opportunity pass, preferring to focus their energies on governing the affairs of a mere religious denomination when they could have been establishing the actual kingdom of God on earth.

Reading these entries, one gets a sad sense of what could have been. Here was unquestionably the most important role anyone in the church could have had the privilege of participating in, yet because of hesitation, inaction, and lack of vision after the deaths of Joseph and Hyrum, it never got off the ground. Our Mormon forebears had the opportunity to at least attempt something unprecedented, to lay the foundation for a veritable utopia, yet they botched it. The kingdom could have been well underway by the time any of us were born, and imagine the world we would have come into. Instead we can only lament the loss of that which never was.

You wouldn't know by looking at the LDS Church website today that the Lord condemned the whole church in 1832, and cursed it twelve years later. Mormonism today is one big PR party, with leaders assuring the members that all is well in Zion.

Well, there is no Zion yet, and all is not well in the Church. Those who came before us had the chance to redeem themselves by making Christ their king, but they didn't, and today we see the evidence of those cursings. The kingdom of heaven remains stillborn and Church attendance continues to shrink. If the members of the Council of Fifty had tried and failed, it would be one thing, but they didn't even try. They fell into bickering over petty details, until eventually the whole idea was abandoned as Brigham Young turned Utah not into a theocracy, but into an autocracy with himself at the head and everyone below expected to obey him.

But that's a story for another time. Join me here later this month when I'll provide part three of this discussion, and hopefully that will wrap this up. In the meantime, I can't stress enough the importance of this heretofore hidden episode of Church history. Forget everything else you've been studying about Mormon history; this is the real story right here. The formation of the kingdom of God is what the entire history of the Church had been leading up to before it crashed on the launch pad. The story of the Council of Fifty gives us a fascinating glimpse into what could have been. But just as important, no member of the Church can have a complete picture of what the Lord had in mind for the Restoration who does not avail himself of at least a passing knowledge of this episode in our history.

So, to conclude with some recommendations:

I don't have a favorite among the following three books, because I believe each of them is an essential part of the whole if one is seeking an understanding of this unfinished episode of Mormon history.  For those seeking a very good overview without getting bogged down by the minutiae of the minutes, there's The Council of Fifty: What the Records Reveal About Mormon History. Weighing in at less than 200 pages, This is a collection of essays from LDS scholars who have already waded through the minutes of the council so you don't have to. It is arranged roughly by topics such as The Separatist Impulse; Injustices Leading to the Creation of the Council of Fifty; Constitution Writing in the counsel of Fifty; Lost Teachings of Joseph Smith; and more. Plus photos.

Next, I recommend Signature Books' The Council of Fifty: A Documentary History, edited by Jedediah Rogers. Here you'll find a complete history of what we know about the council in the words of those who were part of it. This volume will give you more of a narrative read, which you can't really get from the minutes. I highly recommend this one for those wanting to dig a little deeper while still not ready to bite into the big book. The Forward and Preface are invaluable summaries, plus you get a list of every member of the council along with a short bio of each. This is helpful, because although some of the names are familiar (all twelve apostles sat on the council), there are several people among that group of fifty-plus you may not have heard of. With maps and pictures.

Finally, the main course, The Joseph Smith Papers: Administrative Records, Council of Fifty Minutes. This is the big one, and it's chock full of intimate details regarding what was discussed at these meetings and why. Even the editors of the multi-volume Joseph Smith Papers strongly suggest that if you can only afford one book from the set, this is the one you should have. The discussions of how the kingdom should be established are extremely insightful, but there is one caveat: we don't always get every word that was spoken in these meetings. Sometimes the recorder merely tells us that Joseph Smith lectured at length to the council, and he leaves it at that. He doesn't tell us anything about what Joseph actually said. It can be maddening wondering what insights and explanations we are missing from the mouth of the prophet, but unfortunately it is what it is. There are still plenty of instances where the recorder provides us with every word, and for that we can be grateful. With maps, photos, drawings, and tables.

One final source, and this one is not only an excellent analysis of the Council of Fifty, it's also available online for free. This is Denver Snuffer's seven part treatise on the kingdom of God, and how the Saints let it slip through their fingers. The advantage of reading this piece first is that Denver provides context as well as plenty of pertinent quotations, all in seven short, easy-to-read segments. This is Denver's series titled "All or Nothing," which, although primarily about the kingdom of heaven, will also provide the reader with an understanding of what will be required of a people who wish to establish themselves as a Zion community. Essential reading.

Check back here later this month when we'll discuss what we lost and how it's still not too late to get some of it back. We're all very fortunate to have a God who believes in giving His people second chances.
                                                                          *****

Extra Added Bonus Feature
For your further edification, I present a photograph of Council of Fifty member John Van Cott, who will be remembered as the guy who wore his beard on his head to keep from running afoul of the BYU Honor Code.






15 comments:

Miguel Aveiro said...

Hey Rock, I found the source for what I said in a comment on your last post:

https://www.lds.org/scriptures/gs/kingdom-of-god-or-kingdom-of-heaven?lang=eng


Guide To The Scriptures - Kingdom of God or Kingdom of Heaven

"The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is the kingdom of God on the earth, but it is at present limited to an ecclesiastical kingdom. During the Millennium, the kingdom of God will be both political and ecclesiastical."

Alan Rock Waterman said...

Thanks for sending me that link, Miguel.

So it looks like they're continuing to simply make it up, contradicting the clear distinctions made by Joseph Smith on more than one occasion. I guess they thought by tossing in a bunch of scriptures about the kingdom of God it would bolster those weasel words they used to explain away the discrepancy.

The kingdom of God and the church are two separate entities, according to the prophet. Until one of those mugs gets an actual revelation contradicting Joseph, his description is going to have to stand.

I understand the current crop of GAs not having an understanding of the doctrine, but then they double down on their errors? Ya gotta love 'em!

Miguel Aveiro said...

I didn't get that the Kingdom of God is a political kingdom. I simply didn't understand it. But according to the guide to the scriptures, they get the part about the political kingdom but still somehow miss that the church isn't the kingdom. Wouldn't they need Joseph's quotes on the matter to understand that it's political but then if they have the quotes at hand then wouldn't they know he was saying the church is not the Kingdom of God?

Also if the kingdom were ecclesiastical, wouldn't it mean that when you have the political kingdom set up, the church will grow into some sort of theocracy? So church commandments become the law of the land, I guess?

matt lohrke said...

So, I'm reading up on this Council of Fifty and I just can't get my head around it.

I'm looking for the actual "revelation" Joseph received on April 7, 1842. Is it published in any of the books mentioned in the post? Every article or write up on the Council states Joseph received a revelation, but I can't find the actual revelation.

Is the March 14, 1844 revelation naming the council extant? Interestingly, on that same date, Hyrum published a letter to the Saint on China Creek stating:

"And again I say unto you, an elder has no business to undertake to preach mysteries in any part of the world, for God has commanded us all to preach nothing but the first principles unto the world." (repentance, faith, baptism, etc)

On April 11, 1844, the Council voted to accept Joseph as "our prophet, priest and King."

King? That's...weird.

Forming a council to preserve their rights against state governments seems strange when the Lord said in March 1829:

"And the testimony of three witnesses (of the Book of Mormon) will I send forth and my word, and behold, whosoever believeth in my word, them will I visit with the manifestation of my Spirit, and they shall be born of me, and their testimony shall also go forth. And thus, if the people of this generation harden not their hearts, I will work a reformation among them, and I will put down all lyings, and deceivings, and priestcrafts, and envyings, and strifes, and idolatries, and sorceries, and all manner of iniquities, and I will establish my church, like unto the church which was taught by my disciples in the days of old. And now if this generation do harden their hearts against my word, behold I will deliver them up unto satan for he reigneth and hath much power at this time, for he hath got great hold upon the hearts of the people of this generation: and not far from the iniquities of Sodom and Gomorrah, do they come at this time: and behold the sword of justice hangeth over their heads, and if they persist in the hardness of their hearts, the time cometh that it must fall upon them... (Book of Commandments, Chapter 4. This was mostly memory-holed in the 1835 D&C)

God offered them the very protections they sought. I think history shows which of the two "if/then" promises happened. Unfortunately, a lot--if not most--of their troubles they brought on themselves because of their "vanity" (fruitless endeavors). Or as Jacob put it, "looking beyond the mark."

This is just me thinking out loud, but if God gave them a chance in 1829 to put down all evil, only to put them under condemnation in 1832 for failing to heed the Book of Mormon, then cursed them 1844, why set up a political "Kingdom," (nominally a "Theocracy" according to Billy Clayton) whose members (some secretly enemies of Joseph, polygamists, fornicators and adulterers) were some of the very people responsible for the problems in the first place.

God works in mysterious ways, it seems.

The Council's minute taker was William Clayton, who claimed he alone was present with Joseph and Hyrum when the infamous 132 is put to paper. I don't trust anything that guy produced, given his track record.

When we are obedient to the commandments and comply with God's will (not our own), He is obligated to grant His divine protection. It's a running theme in the BOM -- obey and you will prosper in the Land.

MC said...

Rock,

It seems to me that the there are some problems with the philosophy of the Council of Fifty.

I'm not an expert on the Council of Fifty, but from what you have presented and from what I have read about the council I don't see any scriptural support for the idea of a political kingdom of God in which people of all religious views and practices (including atheists) will dwell together in harmony with tolerance for the diverse views and beliefs of others.

That this type of kingdom is what Daniel was referring to as the kingdom of God which will roll forth, fill the earth, and crush the other kingdoms of the earth seems like an erroneous interpretation of the scriptures.

It seems Joseph Smith and other members of the Council of Fifty may have believed this to be the case, but that doesn't make it correct.

Do the scriptures support this description of the kingdom of God on earth?

What the scriptures describe about zion and the millennium doesn't square with some of the quotes you have shared from the Council of Fifty.

Joseph Smith was correct that in the last days and during the millennium there will be a political kingdom of God with a king of Israel from the lineage of David.

Why did Joseph Smith have himself crowned king?

Did he believe that he was to be the king during the millennium?

Perhaps he was restoring the ancient kingdom of Israel aka of Ephraim. That would make sense and would also explain why the prophecies in the scriptures about latter day Israel fit the LDS church perfectly.

Anyway that's my take on it.

MrHFMetz said...

Very nice. Hyrum L. Andrus worked on the subject since 1955. For more information go to www.hyrumandrus.com for details. You can download his book "Doctrines of the Kingdom" from the site for 5 dollars. Best regards, R. Metz.

Eric Kuntz said...

Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you. Luke 17:21

Alan Rock Waterman said...

Matt Lohrke and MC,
I've been trying to set aside some time to respond to your questions, because I think they are going to require rather lengthy answers. In the first place, please understand I am no expert on this kingdom of heaven business either. Those books I highly recommend in this post? I haven't finished reading everything in them myself. (The meetings continued for a while after Joseph was gone, and I'm not even certain those parts are going to be of much help in our understanding of what Joseph had in mind.) I CAN tell you, however, that our idea of what a king is differs markedly from what Joseph Smith had in mind when he allowed himself to be crowned prophet, priest, and king.

I'm beginning to think these concerns warrant an entire blog post, which means that rather than this thing turning into a three part series, it will probably stretch to four. So I'll either return and try and tackle these issues here in the comment section, or I'll just try to write another post by the end of this week or next; I'll just have to see.

A big THANK YOU to MrHFMetz for that link to the Hyrum Andrus page. I had no idea such a page existed. I own some of his books, but was amazed to learn of so many other wonderful titles I had never heard of. And so reasonably priced! One or two dollars each? Incredible!

I remember Paul Toscano telling about Hyrum Andrus being invited into the Church archives in the 1970's (this was during the much more open days when Leonard Arrington was Church Historian) and excitingly taking a crowbar to crates of documents that had been nailed shut ever since they were brought from Nauvoo. We can get an idea of the treasure trove Andrus discovered simply by looking at the titles of those books.

Kai Gorbahn said...

"Perhaps he was restoring the ancient kingdom of Israel aka of Ephraim. That would make sense and would also explain why the prophecies in the scriptures about latter day Israel fit the LDS church perfectly. "
--MC

Great comment!

I'd like to remind me people of the prophecy about John the Baptist in Section 84. He is supposed to overthrow the kingdom of the Jews.

Did that prophecy come true in the Meridian of time??

Me thinks not.

I think John the Baptist will overthrow the LDS church, which as MC suggested, is the kingdom of ancient Israel once again established in the form of a church.


Rock,

I urge you to reconsider your position. The Kingdom of God will break into pieces the kingdoms of this world!! This is literal. The LDS church obviously has not done this, but it WAS the kingdom. Joseph Smith held the keys of the kingdom, according to Section 90, in this world and in the world to come. Therefore when he was taken from the earth, the kingdom of God was lost too. In early D&C revelations, the Lord tells the Saints that they have received the kingdom/Joseph.

If you want my opinion on the Council of Fifty, it was obviously a symptom of the apostasy that took place in 1835. Joseph Smith turned to the dark side and caught got up with secret combinations and secret abominations.

Masonry, council of fifty, and the esoteric temple rituals were giving the people/the Jews what they desired.

When Joseph Smith returns to the earth with the keys of the kingdom, that kingdom will go forth and break to pieces the kingdoms of this world. This is literal. Joseph Smith and the first labourers of the last kingdom will destroy countries and governments and establish the people of God.

The kingdom of God will have one religion: the gospel of Christ. Believers in any other god than the Creator of this world will be swept off the face of the land.

-Kai

Underdog2 said...

Kai,

You said: "Joseph Smith turned to the dark side and [got caught] up with secret combinations and secret abominations."

Then said: "When Joseph Smith returns to the earth with the keys of the kingdom, that kingdom will go forth and break to pieces the kingdoms of this world."

I'm puzzled by how a fallen prophet can return with any keys or authority. Can you explain the contradiction?

Kai Gorbahn said...

I do not believe that it was Joseph Smith's fault that he turned to the darkside.

The church was warned in the original book of commandments that if they hardened their hearts, they would be delivered over to Satan.

Joseph was delivering the church over to Satan, as warned.

The church did not keep the commandments of God. When the church failed to build the Nauvoo Boarding House, it was rejected.

After it was rejected, Joseph Smith began teaching polygamy to a secret group of men.

It doesn't take rocket science to put two and two together here. Obviously polygamy is a load of crap. You might deny Joseph's involvement in it, but personally I think it makes perfect sense that this happened.

2nd Nephi 27:5 "For behold, ye have closed your eyes, and ye have rejected the prophets; and your rulers, and the seers hath he covered because of your iniquity."

The seer Joseph had his eyes covered. With no church on the earth, there was no sanctification. Without sanctification, Joseph operated as other men. Men in his position would take advantage of women. He did what any other man would do.

Had the Saints repented and followed the commands of God, Joseph and the people would have been sanctified and ushered in the dispensation of the fulness of times.

So Joseph is to not be blamed. It sounds like a free pass but it's not. Without the sanctifying power of the fulness of the priesthood, none of us are sanctified. None of us have repented and become clean before the Lord. If we had, the sealed portion would have come forth. We are in the same position as Joseph, if we are humble followers of Christ. We cannot be cleansed from sin without the everlasting covenant. We need to enter the law of consecration, sacrifice all things, and receive a baptism of fire.

This is is not occurring in this day and age as far as I am aware.

We must wait patiently for the Marvelous Work, the strange act. Joseph Smith is the everlasting covenant. We need him to continue where he left off.

-Kai

-Kai

MC said...

Underdog2,

Kai appears to hold a similar view on Joseph Smith and LDS history as two bloggers known as Watcher and Searcher.

You can check out their views and the scriptures they use to support them at onewhoiswatching.wordpress.com and onewhoissearching.com

They are both very well versed in the scriptures and have very interesting theories that attempt to explain some of the historical contradictions in the church, our current situation, and what they expect will happen before Christ returns.

I'm not saying I agree with all of their views, but it's worth checking out. They're good guys and one can learn a lot from them.

Ryan Nickel said...

Nice post Rock.

The moment we dive into deeper doctrine all the other commentaries seem to go away.

I too have read most of what Watcher and Searcher and several others have written about the marvelous work which is a future event.

I believe it’ll have very little to do with what Jospeh and the Council of Fifty established and what Brigham later elaborated on.

Isn’t the Kingdom of God full of the Church of the Firstborn?

Linda Gale said...

I am very concerned about Joseph being lauded as "prophet, priest and king". I'm pretty sure that title belongs to Jesus Christ, and to Jesus Christ only.

How could Joseph, in good faith, take on that title which belongs to the Savior? Could be wrong, but it appears to be blasphemous to me.

Dave P. said...

Linda,

That goes back to what the original Book of Commandments stated about Joseph. His gift was to translate the Book of Mormon and that he should pretend to have no other, for God wasn't going to give him one.

Joseph setting himself up as a king was what painted himself into a corner. By the time he tried to cast that mantle off, the people were so used to going to him for every little thing that they couldn't break that tradition, much to his endless frustration.