tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post4077263651098218330..comments2024-03-26T21:27:42.278-07:00Comments on Pure Mormonism: Did The Lord Choose Not To Anoint "The Lord's Anointed"?Alan Rock Watermanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04971243364867111868noreply@blogger.comBlogger353125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-40208140630543223782022-04-08T15:24:55.595-07:002022-04-08T15:24:55.595-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Jordomazinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16356181868527374537noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-75716242384608006052018-07-09T20:13:22.344-07:002018-07-09T20:13:22.344-07:00There is not evidence that Brigham Young was ever ...There is not evidence that Brigham Young was ever appointed to b the successor to Joseph Smith. In fact, he campaigned and pushed until those who objected to his pursuit of the office of the President gave up and gave in.Cecil Champenois, Jr.https://www.blogger.com/profile/15988762282752607021noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-89563380355080225222017-01-23T12:36:30.248-08:002017-01-23T12:36:30.248-08:00iterry,
I know it's hard to even think that J...iterry,<br /><br />I know it's hard to even think that JS was anything less than a true prophet of God, like the ones you mentioned. It was hard for me. I idolized JS for most of my life, but I was mistaken and have repented of that. I go back to my last comment. I use the word of God as my standard for truth. The truth is all that I am interested in, nothing else. The simple truth is that if you measure JS's relevations and actions against the relevations and actions of true prophets as contained in the word of God (Bible & BOM) you will find a disconnect. <br /><br />Just (1) example of a comparison of JS to Warren Jeffs would be Joseph’s first polygamous marriage to Fanny Alger as claimed by the LDS Church now. Actually it was an extra marital affair which drove a wedge between Smith and Oliver Cowdery.<br /><br />If JS was talking to God after the Book of Mormon translation was complete, there is no evidence of this, because his revelations in the D&C are contradictory to the rest of the scriptural canon.<br /><br /><br /><br />Eric Kuntzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00701839435404901159noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-69704212178686594882017-01-22T18:46:45.719-08:002017-01-22T18:46:45.719-08:00Eric, I don't know how you could compare Josep...Eric, I don't know how you could compare Joseph Smith Jr. to Warren Jeffs. Warren when he was hauled into court and off to jail said he was no prophet. Joseph on the other hand was a great prophet of the Lord in the last days. Nothing compares to him other than the ancient prophets such as Moses. Joseph brought forth a great deal of scripture which include the D&C and PofGP. Nothing compares to these things. <br /><br />I certainly haven't read any of Warren Jeffs revelation but I'm sure they aren't inspired of God. Afterall, all revelation was cutoff to the Church after we arrived in these valleys in 1847 according to D&C 101:43-62. iterryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14836783863542965577noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-12362913931488977142017-01-22T09:33:16.503-08:002017-01-22T09:33:16.503-08:00@JR
I defend the doctrine as restored through Jos...@JR<br /><br />I defend the doctrine as restored through Joseph Smith. <br /><br />Why defend Joseph? We should only be using the scriptures as a standard (Bible & BOM) and defend them.<br /><br />If you look into Joseph Smith Jr as closely as you have the current LDS leaders you will find the current leaders have nothing compared to JS. (JS is on par with Warren Jeffs)<br /><br />Have courage to continue your search for truth and root out all lies.<br />Eric Kuntzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00701839435404901159noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-15235903117726108522017-01-21T13:20:30.382-08:002017-01-21T13:20:30.382-08:00It's interesting how the RLDS have prophets to...It's interesting how the RLDS have prophets too, who are praying for revelation. So who is God talking to? The LDS or RLDS? Both? Neither?<br /><br />I can only go by what revelation I've received myself. I'm not interested in the different branches of Mormonism. I don't mean I'm not interested in learning about them but I don't care for what group is the right one. I just go where I believe the Lord wants me to go.Steak Presedenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11145688976336741401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-9243323021354855642017-01-18T13:09:53.746-08:002017-01-18T13:09:53.746-08:00JR - couldn't agree with you more. The term I ...JR - couldn't agree with you more. The term I like to use is apostasy. The Church leaders are in a total state of apostasy. They've corrupted the ordinances and introduced many other policies contrary to the commandments of God. This is all prophesied in Isaiah and other books including the D&C. The parable of the Nobleman (D&C 101:43-62) says that the leaders in our day do not keep the commandments of God. It is too bad that the members have been dumbed down so much and brainwashed that they cannot see the apostasy of the Church. Lucifer has been very effective in blinding the members of the Church. iterryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14836783863542965577noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-16517886484084471532017-01-17T11:43:57.840-08:002017-01-17T11:43:57.840-08:00@iterry,
So glad to see someone who believes the ...@iterry,<br /><br />So glad to see someone who believes the same as I do on many issues. <br /><br />I defend the doctrine as restored through Joseph Smith. <br />I do not defend the Salt Lake City church leaders of today. <br /><br />The temple ordinances being changed was a punch in the gut to me. The church leaders are giving in to "the ways of man", giving in Political Correctness to appease a few loud mouths because their feelings are hurt and it makes them uncomfortable - as all mainstream Christian denominations have done. <br />Political Correctness is a tool used by Satan to divide and cause anarchy. The Communists use it very expertly. The church no longer warns of the dangers of Communism and the ways of man. The leaders have succumbed to it all. JRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12745174941243069168noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-25105335801315983212017-01-10T22:49:56.228-08:002017-01-10T22:49:56.228-08:00Bonnie Forsyth,
I was very happy to see your comme...Bonnie Forsyth,<br />I was very happy to see your comment here, but I confess I don't know what to make of the questions you pose. You appear to feel I have done something wrong, but you neglect to tell me what.<br /><br />You ask, "Do you wish to lead others astray?"<br /><br />I can't for the life of me see how you could conclude I engaged in deception. If I have erred in history or doctrine, I will be happy to correct those errors. Just point them out. <br /><br />I re-read my piece again, looking for evidence of what might have caused you to wonder about my motives. What I see is a fervent testimony of Christ and His restored gospel, an unabashed admiration for the prophet of the Restoration, and a strong assertion that we must never falter in our search for truth. We are warned against embracing vain traditions. My piece brought to light some of the mistaken assumptions some of us held all our lives about church history and doctrine, yet the concern you voice to me is "what will be the outcome of this intensive study? When you stand before the Lord, what will you say you achieved?"<br /><br />Well, at the very least I hope I will be able to say I followed His admonitions in D&C 88 to labor diligently, search diligently, seek diligently, and teach diligently. <br /><br />I haven't "achieved" much at all in this life, Bonnie, but I certainly hope that when I face the Savior at judgement day I can at least say I was diligent in laboring for truth. <br /><br />As I think you know, I'm an admirer of apostle J. Reuben Clark, who said, "If we have the truth, it cannot be harmed by investigation." <br /><br />Well, we do have the truth in this church; scads of it. But in our day members also cling to a number of falsehoods. So I embrace President Clark's corollary statement: "if we have NOT the truth, it ought to be harmed."<br /><br />Don't you agree that our assumptions about the church that are NOT true deserve discussion? You seem to be advising me to keep the conversation to myself. <br /><br />Why? Although the core fundamentals of the faith are true and valid, should the false teachings that creep in be permitted to remain once we have access to early church records that bring to light the truth about those long-held assumptions? <br /><br />How does it further the cause of truth when we teach "the philosophies of men mingled with scripture"? Wouldn't that violate our mandate to "prove (investigate) ALL things, and hold fast to that which is good"? Do you really feel God would prefer we hold fast to that which is true AND that which is false just to "boost the testimonies" of members who have come to rely on the arm of flesh for their religion?<br /><br />You ask, "who do you follow, Alan?"<br /><br />Bonnie, I honestly don't know how you could come away from a reading of my essay with anything other than the clear knowledge that I follow Jesus Christ. Maybe it would help if you gave it another read-through, because you must have missed how that obvious testimony infuses the entire piece. <br /><br />You ask me, "what will be the outcome of this intensive study?"<br /><br />Apostle Hugh Brown said, "I admire men and women who have developed the questing spirit, who are unafraid of new ideas as stepping stones to progress...Thoughts and expressions compete in the marketplace of thought, and in that competition truth emerges triumphant. Only error fears freedom of expression."<br /><br />For me, the outcome of this intensive study has been a renewed appreciation for the restored gospel and a closer walk with Christ. Isn't that what I should be DILIGENTLY striving to attain in this life? We haven't seen each other for more than a decade, Bonnie, but I would hope you might be happy to see the amount of growth in me since last we met.<br /><br />You conclude with a statement that I agree with heartily: "I love the Lord and believe in His prophets." <br /><br />So do I, Bonnie. I don't know how you could read my piece and conclude I feel any differently.<br />Alan Rock Watermanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04971243364867111868noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-5427604868204168712017-01-10T09:19:46.362-08:002017-01-10T09:19:46.362-08:00@Anonymous,
The claim you made that I asked you t...@Anonymous,<br /><br />The claim you made that I asked you to substantiate by public evidence was that none of the 'prophets' in the Church keep the commandments of Christ.<br /><br />Thus far, your comments have been entirely dedicated to avoiding providing the requested public evidence that none of the 'prophets' in the Church keep the commandments of God. So long as you refuse to provide the requested public evidence which supports your claim that none of the 'prophets' in the Church keep the commandments of Christ, I have to agree: it is useless to discuss things further.<br /><br />It is to be noted that this uselessness of discussing things further comes not by way of bad faith on my part, but by way of your refusal to support your claim that none of the 'prophets' in the Church keep the commandments of Christ. This refusal on your part, which leads directly to the uselessness of discussing things further, has nothing to do with any opinions on my part as to whether or not any of the 'prophets' in the Church keep the commandments of Christ.<br /><br />Remember - the same standard of judgement you apply against others shall be the standard against which you are judged.Jared Liveseyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10309044282039536254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-64429050981932206422017-01-10T07:54:45.738-08:002017-01-10T07:54:45.738-08:00But, you know as well as I do that public records ...But, you know as well as I do that public records show (that are easy enough to find if someone wants to do the homework) that either Joseph lied about living polygamy or Brigham did (and all other leaders since him who support the idea). It's that simple. For it's impossible they could have both been telling the truth. And whichever one lied it means it's impossible for the Church to be true today, not even considering all the other commandments of Christ they seem to ignore. But you do not seem to really want to discuss and find the truth, but just want to skip around it. That is also why I think it's useless to discuss things further. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-13869510214213319202017-01-09T23:48:39.960-08:002017-01-09T23:48:39.960-08:00And that is why I believe it would do no good to d...And that is why I believe it would do no good to discuss things further. Thank you. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-60135315540311960782017-01-09T23:06:25.965-08:002017-01-09T23:06:25.965-08:00Without the publicly available evidence by which o...Without the publicly available evidence by which one may attribute an actual lie to an actual 'prophet,' we are attributing to a part of a whole a property of the whole. Whenever we attribute a property of a whole to a part of that whole by simple virtue of the fact that the part is, indeed, part of the whole, we commit the fallacy of division. While a true proposition may be the consequent of a fallacious argument, the fact that the argument is fallacious means we can place no confidence in the conclusion, since the conclusion may be false even if the antecedent is true.Jared Liveseyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10309044282039536254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-27509646862596179562017-01-09T22:44:36.477-08:002017-01-09T22:44:36.477-08:00@Anonymous,
Name even one of the 'prophets...@Anonymous,<br /><br />Name even one of the 'prophets' in the Church who lied, and provide the public evidence for the lie. As an example, you might say "Elder Nelson said we should lie for the Lord in his Conference address of X/X/XXXX Morning Session."<br /><br />I will decline to address the rest of your comment, as you seem to not be grounding your positions on the scriptures, which makes it difficult to find any common ground from which to build a consensus.Jared Liveseyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10309044282039536254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-67139673206540782962017-01-09T22:15:57.501-08:002017-01-09T22:15:57.501-08:00Log,
I provided one example on 'lying', ...Log, <br /><br />I provided one example on 'lying', what is your response to that one? <br /><br />But again, I don't think you will agree that my evidence is evidence if you think they are keeping the commandments, so I don't see the point in taking the time to discuss it all. <br /><br />I don't believe the world required Christ to teach the truth, it's just that he was a rare adult who actually believed in and lived those teachings and God gave us an example of someone who did. I hope other ages and people had their own examples like him. <br /><br />And as you have shown we all have our own interpretations of even Christ's teachings and commandments, so that is why it's hard to convince others of our views. We all just have to decide and discern on our own, getting some things right and some wrong. Realizing we are probably wrong about a lot, if not most things, is the fast track to learning. But we will all arrive at the truth eventually, in this life or the next. <br /><br />I believe everyone in all religions understands 'the Golden Rule and love' as Christ taught it, though few may really follow or teach it the right way, for the natural man in us gets in the way. If we didn't already know right & wrong, than only those exposed to Christ's teachings would be so blessed and also so accountable for living such a high law, while everyone else could relax, do what they want and not take life so seriously, which would cause everyone to not want to be exposed to Christ, for it would mean more condemnation. <br /><br />So it wouldn't work or be fair and it would thus be unkind to share the Gospel, for it would be better to break the commandments 'unknowingly', then to do it knowing you are. <br /><br />But I believe Adam and his age understood the Golden Rule and love just the same as we do today, and everyone in between. But that is just my opinion. <br /><br />I believe we are born with the Gospel in our hearts, but it's still hard for everyone to follow it for the natural man in us usually wins out. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-84950410897601304122017-01-09T20:49:42.345-08:002017-01-09T20:49:42.345-08:00Thus my evidence will probably not be evidence to ...<i>Thus my evidence will probably not be evidence to you so I have learned it's usually not fruitful to discuss it unless you also agree they didn't and don't keep some of the commandments and that keeping all Christ's commandments is a vital requirement for being a true prophet.</i><br /><br />I asked you for evidence that they didn't and don't keep some of the commandments of Christ and you declined to provide any at all.<br /><br /><i>In reference to Luke 12:33, I believe that we know deep down that we should live humbly and share our good fortune and abilities if there are those in need around us.</i><br /><br />Except that wasn't what was said.<br /><br /><i>There's a reason all major religions teach the Golden Rule and love, not just Christians. </i><br /><br />They don't. I checked. Of all that we have record of, Christ alone said "all things whatsoever ye would that men should do unto you, do ye even so unto them, for this is the law and the prophets." The rest give a negative shadow of this law - "that which you hate, don't do to others." Christ's Golden Rule is much, much more than that negative shadow.<br /><br /><i>We don't need [Christ's words] to know right from wrong.</i><br /><br />You only need Christ's words to know what he commanded us to both do and also to not do, such as "do not amass resources for yourself upon the earth" and "sell all your possessions and distribute the proceeds of their sale to the poor." Since salvation, the Bible informs us, is contingent upon keeping *all* the commandments of Christ, it would seem to be important for us to know about these commandments.<br /><br /><i>Even a child could teach the Gospel of Christ.</i><br /><br />And yet it required Christ to teach it. Why is that?Jared Liveseyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10309044282039536254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-15052330456103685582017-01-09T20:31:17.417-08:002017-01-09T20:31:17.417-08:00Log,
I have long learned that if people doesn...Log, <br /><br />I have long learned that if people doesn't see or think there are certain red flags than usually no amount of 'evidence' will convince a person otherwise, for we see and believe what we want to see and believe. Thus my evidence will probably not be evidence to you so I have learned it's usually not fruitful to discuss it unless you also agree they didn't and don't keep some of the commandments and that keeping all Christ's commandments is a vital requirement for being a true prophet. And then also, there is the meaning of each commandment and what it takes to keep it. <br /> <br />In reference to Luke 12:33, I believe that we know deep down that we should live humbly and share our good fortune and abilities if there are those in need around us. It would be a natural inclination unless we dulled our conscience by ignoring it. <br /><br />Christ knew that most mortals, before or after him, would never hear or read his 'sayings', but that doesn't mean anyone in any age of time can't be or aren't expected to be 'Christlike' just the same. There's a reason all major religions teach the Golden Rule and love, not just Christians. <br /><br />We have no proof that Christ even existed, though his teachings prove someone in that age was extremely intelligent, wise and loving. But though I hope he did and does exist, we don't need to read his words or read a Bible or listen to a so called 'prophet' or go to any church, to know right from wrong. Even a child could teach the Gospel of Christ. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-56842528587603474412017-01-09T08:52:34.559-08:002017-01-09T08:52:34.559-08:00I will also address this statement - "Christ ...I will also address this statement - "Christ was just reminding people of what we already all know and understand deep down in our conscience, the Golden Rule and love."<br /><br />He said a lot of things which were, in fact, not obvious and without direct instruction not done.<br /><br />One such instruction was the command to sell all our possessions and distribute the proceeds of the sale to the poor. (Luke 12:33)<br /><br />He also said "he that has my sayings and keeps them is he who loves me." (John 14:21)<br /><br />There seems therefore to be a necessity of at least reading the New Testament in order to love him.Jared Liveseyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10309044282039536254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-14364415447908372262017-01-09T08:19:26.027-08:002017-01-09T08:19:26.027-08:00Anonymous,
You say: "No matter what I say I ...Anonymous,<br /><br />You say: "No matter what I say I do not believe I could convince you otherwise than what you believe."<br /><br />I say: I asked for the publicly available and observable evidence because I am persuadable by evidence. What you have offered isn't sufficient - and in that sense - lacking evidence - there may indeed be nothing you can say that could convince me otherwise than what you think I believe. But your inability to persuade comes not by my bad faith, but because you have no evidence and can't prove your case.<br /><br />It may well be true none of them keep Christ's commandments. But it is not assertible without actual positive evidence for each individual accused of not keeping the commandments.Jared Liveseyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10309044282039536254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-5204624054740689602017-01-09T00:03:32.698-08:002017-01-09T00:03:32.698-08:00Log,
You asked - "What publicly observable a...Log,<br /><br />You asked - "What publicly observable and available evidence is there that "none [of the 'prophets'] in the Church" keep Christ's commandments?"<br /><br /><br />No matter what I say I do not believe I could convince you otherwise than what you believe. I believe everyone has to discern and decide these things for themselves and depending on how we keep the commandments ourselves we will have different opinions on whether prophets do or not. <br /><br />But for starters, I don't believe LDS prophets have kept even all of the basic 10 commandments, let alone other commandments Christ gave. One example being, does not the Church believe Joseph lied about his denials about polygamy or that Brigham believed lying for the Lord was ok? Both would be against Christ's commandments and make either impossible to trust. <br /><br />You also asked - "Out of curiosity, since Christ also said "with what judgement ye judge, ye shall be judged." Seems to me such judgements - whether against Snuffer or the leaders of the Church or Joseph or the apostles of Christ or the prophets in the OT - are to be made with extreme caution and only if they can be proven by two or three witnesses, but what do you say?"<br /><br />When we study all that Christ supposedly taught on the subject in the NT, and not just 1 verse (that may not even be accurately quoting him), it appears he commanded us to judge and discern whether prophets (or anyone or anything) is true or not by using the standard of his commandments. And yes, we will also have to be living those commandments ourselves and be judged by them, or we won't be able to discern very accurately. <br /><br />For Christ taught that the key to discerning accurately is to 1st remove the beam out of our own eye, only then will we be able to see if our brother needs help or not. <br /><br />Bottom line, no one can judge/discern for us, we must all pass that test on our own, whether we fall for or are deceived by false prophets or not, which Christ said could lead to the loss of eternal life. <br /><br />Thus he didn't make it very hard, since so much rides on it. In fact, to make it fair for all mankind, no one even needs to read the New Testament to know right from wrong. Christ was just reminding people of what we already all know and understand deep down in our conscience, the Golden Rule and love. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-37670593381013624512017-01-08T19:25:40.796-08:002017-01-08T19:25:40.796-08:00What an impressive body of work! What are you tryi...What an impressive body of work! What are you trying to achieve? Do you wish to lead others astray or to boost their testimonies? You are very intellligent and I love you, but what will the outcome be of this intensive study? When you stand before the Lord, what will you say you achieved? Where are you headed? I don't get how you can be so involved in proving the leaders wrong. Who do you follow, Alan? I love the prophets and our disciples. They are awesome. Sopo spending so much timie and effort on this line of thought. I love the Lord and believe in his prophets.Bonnie Forsythnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-31767772561344816362017-01-08T15:41:29.719-08:002017-01-08T15:41:29.719-08:00Vinny,
Log is quoting Isaiah 58 from the Gileadi ...Vinny,<br /><br />Log is quoting Isaiah 58 from the Gileadi translation: http://www.isaiahexplained.com/58#one_col<br />Craig Morrisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-3419744143472903292017-01-08T14:06:13.274-08:002017-01-08T14:06:13.274-08:00Log,
What is the source of those 14 verses regard...Log,<br /><br />What is the source of those 14 verses regarding the fast?Vinnynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-31778767138124989952017-01-08T12:40:50.846-08:002017-01-08T12:40:50.846-08:00MrHFMetz, There are other sources that name John t...MrHFMetz, There are other sources that name John the beloved as the Davidic King of the last days as well. Francis Darter identified the lineage of John as a cousin of Christ and hence Davidic. The book "Scriptures of the Last days" which is a complete commentary on Isaiah by Robert Smith goes into great detail about John and his mission in the last days. He also wrote Last Days Unsealed which goes into John's mission as well. You can find it on Amazon. <br /><br />I didn't realize that you hailed from Europe. You can likely talk about things much more so than those of us who live near Salt lake. Particularly if you bring up the idea that John is the Davidic King. iterryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14836783863542965577noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1342380624800894371.post-37001461879559616722017-01-08T11:44:44.606-08:002017-01-08T11:44:44.606-08:00Thanks for the response. So I was in my Priesthood...Thanks for the response. So I was in my Priesthood meeting, but there was'nt much time to bring up the issue. Though if someone is critical – which does happen in my ward occasionally – people just smile; the Mormon culture in Europe is quite relaxed, and people are convinced that all is well in Zion anyway.<br />This knowledge about John the beloved comes from a book that I am reading at the moment, called Zion's Redemption, from Francis Michael Darter, who lived from 1881 till 1968, and who apparently entertained polygamist ideals. A very spriritual man. How is it, I sometimes wonder, that some of these people – like Ogden Kraut for instance – go so deep in their theology and come up with remarkable truths? To me that is surprising, in particular because I consider this Mormon polygamy thing as a theological deviation, and not a commandment of God.R. Metzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15875261161185193692noreply@blogger.com